<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Servant Leadership: Where’s the Organizational Payoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alanmorantz.com/servant-leadership-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alanmorantz.com/servant-leadership-controversy/</link>
	<description>people management research decoded :: by alan morantz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.alanmorantz.com/servant-leadership-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanmorantz.com/?p=200#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Leadership is situational and personal.  Any leadership theory that purports to have the &quot;right approach&quot; to leadership will always be somewhat simplistic and suspect.  

Here&#039;s a situation where I think it is working -- a professional service firm that has just experienced a difficult and painful leadership coup.  In this organization, leadership is an obligation to serve.  You are asked to serve and you do it as a way to &quot;give back&quot; to your firm.  As in most firms all partners are peers whether they are in leadership or not. This particular organization needed also needed some healing.  Servant leadership is a fit in this case.

The criticisms of this style are valid and are being leveled at the leader in question in this firm.  Is this a sustainable style?  We&#039;ll see.  Is any leadership style sustainable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leadership is situational and personal.  Any leadership theory that purports to have the &#8220;right approach&#8221; to leadership will always be somewhat simplistic and suspect.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a situation where I think it is working &#8212; a professional service firm that has just experienced a difficult and painful leadership coup.  In this organization, leadership is an obligation to serve.  You are asked to serve and you do it as a way to &#8220;give back&#8221; to your firm.  As in most firms all partners are peers whether they are in leadership or not. This particular organization needed also needed some healing.  Servant leadership is a fit in this case.</p>
<p>The criticisms of this style are valid and are being leveled at the leader in question in this firm.  Is this a sustainable style?  We&#8217;ll see.  Is any leadership style sustainable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

